<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ilaxSTUDIO &#187; Nicolas Cage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ilaxstudio.com/blog/tag/nicolas-cage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ilaxstudio.com/blog</link>
	<description>Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Knowing [7]</title>
		<link>http://www.ilaxstudio.com/blog/2009/03/29/knowing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ilaxstudio.com/blog/2009/03/29/knowing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 03:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kilax</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Raves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netflix Queue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicolas Cage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilaxstudio.com/blog/?p=2133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has anyone else seen Knowing? Steven and I saw a preview for this when we went to see Taken. I turned over to him and said &#8220;That looks really good, but&#8230; Nicolas Cage is in it&#8230;&#8221; I had kind of written off Nicolas Cage movies as &#8220;immediately in the Netflix Queue&#8221; movies. As in, &#8220;not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="border: 0pt none; float:left;  padding-right:10px; padding-bottom:10px" src="http://www.ilaxstudio.com/knowing.jpg" alt="image:Knowing Theatrical Poster" width="149" height="221" />Has anyone else seen <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0448011/" target="_blank"><em>Knowing</em></a>?</p>
<p>Steven and I saw a preview for this when we went to see <em>Taken</em>. I turned over to him and said &#8220;That looks really good, but&#8230; Nicolas Cage is in it&#8230;&#8221; I had kind of written off Nicolas Cage movies as &#8220;immediately in the Netflix Queue&#8221; movies. As in, &#8220;not worth seeing in theater!&#8221;</p>
<p>But Ebert gave it 4 stars (like that means anything, I know), we love &#8220;the world&#8217;s coming to an end&#8221; movies, and had a free movie ticket*, so we decided to go.</p>
<p>Wow. I was completely shocked by this movie. We all know from the previews that the movie is about a sheet of paper with a bunch of numbers all over it. Nicolas Cage gets a hold of the paper and figures out the numbers correspond to dates of horrific events and the number of deaths. Pretty freaky already, right?</p>
<p>Well, I don&#8217;t want to give it away, but the movie is a little bit more complicated than that. It took on a much more different angle than I expected it to based on the preview.  And it seriously <em>creeped </em>me out. As in, I was grabbing Steven&#8217;s arm in the theater, and will probably have nightmares.</p>
<p>I wish I could say more, but I don&#8217;t want to spoil it. If you were thinking about seeing it in the theater, I think it is worth it.</p>
<p><small>*We are signed up for the free rewards program at our theater, and they keep giving us free drinks, and popcorn and tickets! They gave us another ticket tonight! Sweet!!!</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ilaxstudio.com/blog/2009/03/29/knowing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

